I
recently met a University mate of mine in a very popular restaurant in Accra. As
usual the question that comes to mind after meeting a long time school mate is
“so what are you doing or where are you”?
I
was very impressed when this friend told me that he was managing his own
business that is to say he is self employed. He indicated that
right after school like a typical graduate he was
offered employment by a firm after a
writing series of application letters.
During this period of employment, he felt that although he was employed by the
firm as a technical person on the job, his technical submission on issues
regarding the business was not respected by the people who employed or hired
him. He felt useless in this business and therefore left to establish his own
business.
After
he told me of what he has been up to, I also told him I work for a financial
institution and this answer sparked up some interesting conversation relating to
the relationship between the self
employed business in Ghana and the
banks. Like any other entrepreneur he
started lamenting about how difficult it was to access
loans from the bank to finance their operations or contracts that had been
already secured. He concluded that, the banks were not very helpful and not
very innovative in their dealings with small and medium businesses in Ghana. He
confirmed this by telling me of what his bank is requesting from him before
they can grant him a loan to finance a contract that he has currently secured.
As usual the bank is asking for tangible security (landed property
) or cash equivalent before they can start talking about loan of any kind. I am
sure that most owners of small and medium business can identify with the
frustrations of this man and are hopeful that one day their frustrations will
be over.
The state of relationship between the bank and
SME owners for me is due to the misunderstanding between both parties. What I
mean to say is that the banks are yet to fully appreciate the psychology of SMEs
and their owners. In the same vain SME owners seem not to understand the psychology
of the banks and its officers .Unfortunately it
seems this perceive misunderstanding is increasing on a day to day basis
and this is as a result of certain revelation from my discussions and other
observations made.
For instance in my conversation with my
business owner mate I advised him to not to limit his search for loans to the
main banks or traditional banks but he should talk to other non –bank financial
institutions . The main focus on this article is hinged on the responds I
receive after asking him to consider accessing loans from some of the non-bank
financial institutions around. It was surprising to me when the entrepreneur
told me that it was a common knowledge that if you use loans from some of the non-bank
financial institutions around, your business will collapse. According to him the
information around town is that the loans from these institutions were “spiritually
adulterated” and has the power to destroy your business if you use money from
that source.
This
answer surprised me for many reasons. The main reason why I was surprised was
the level of education of this mate and the fact that he had come to believe in
statement like this. This statement is an indication that there is strong need
for financial literacy education for majority of small and medium enterprise
owners. This should be looked at again
especially by the financial sector players
to ensure that the men and women
managing the small enterprises are better place
to effectively manage the loans
or debt they contract to help the growth of their businesses and also to ensure
prompt and consistent repayment of loans to their bankers.
The
fallout from this little discussion points to the fact that there is more work
to be done in the area of building the financial literacy capacities of owners of
SMEs in Ghana. It is obvious that the problem associated to taking on loan from
alternative financial houses mainly is with the interest rate charged on the
loans. Most of these alternative financial houses are more proactive and have
good appetite for risk associated to financing SMEs than most traditional banks.
From a non-scientific point it can be concluded that it is easier to access
loans from the “alternative financial institutions” than from the traditional
banks. This is supported by the many comments made many entrepreneurs regarding
the fact that banks were not meeting their financial needs and that the loan requirements put in place equally
make it difficult for SME owners to provide this requirement in order to access
loans.
The
thought that some “bank money” can collapse your business is a strong indication
that most entrepreneurs are yet to appreciate the importance of a thorough
analysis of the loans they take and its implication on their business. For most
business men and women the mere desire for a loan consumes them so much that
they fail to scrutinize the interest element on the loan to ascertain if their
enterprise can comfortably finance the repayment of the loan and its associated
interest.
I
am tempted to believe that the reason why there is this thinking that a loan
from some institutions can collapse a business is mainly due to the cost of the
loan and the inability of most enterprises to generate enough income to cover
the principal and interest. Another
reason may be due to poor loan management by some clients who after taking a
loan from a bank may not apply it for the intended reason for which it was
borrowed. In the event where some borrowers are able to pay off their loans, it may happen that they may have serviced the loan repayment by
partially using a portion of their initial
capital. If that happens it becomes difficult for the entrepreneur to refinance
the purchase of stock or materials to the same level that they started with and
at this point the perception that some money can collapse your business become
real to them.
The
bank and SME relationship can be mutually beneficial if an understanding is
reached between owners of SMEs and the bank’s. The fact is, owners of SMEs
think the bank does not quickly respond to their needs and even if they do they
mostly do not grant them all the loans they need. Others believe that the bank
ask for too many things that goes to prevent them from qualifying for the
loans. The need for landed properties as
collaterals in a country like Ghana where majority of land owners don’t have
land title registrations or sometimes the request for cash collaterals for a
clients who needs cash makes it
difficult for most SMEs to meet the requirement for loans. The logic of this kind of arrangement is only
understood by the banks and not the clients. Some SME operators also perceived
that some bank officials have some negative attitude towards SMEs and therefore
shy away unnecessarily from dealing with SMEs.
The
banks on the other hand also have some genuine issues regarding the financing
of SMEs. This is largely based on the manner in which most SMEs are managed. To
the banks the lack of proper business records, lack of collateral to secure the
facilities, improper banking culture, low level of literacy among SME
operators, poor governance, lack of secession planes, etc all together make the
granting of loans to SMEs a high risk business.
Understanding of the various stakeholders involved
in improving access to SMEs is very paramount. The blame game cannot be left at
the door steps of the banks by the SMEs operators and similarly the banks cannot
leave the SMEs to their fate. This is mainly because as stated by developmental
experts, SMEs holds a very important part in the growth of all economies. This,
therefore, calls for positive collaborations by governments, trade
associations, and district assemblies, financial institutions to contribute to
ensuring that the problems and challenges identified are adequately addressed
for the benefit of the entire economy.
When
the capacity of the SME operators are developed, they will be in the position to
better negotiate the terms and conditions of the loans they take so that they
are able to comfortably use them to expand their business enterprise and in
addition pay off their loans and the related interest and still be able to
sustain their business activities.
Additionally
banks should also build the capacity of its officers to fully understand and
adopt some entrepreneur skills to further help them to understand the
operations of SMEs to enable them better provide the needed services to this
sector.
Due
to the high cost associated to providing training services to the SME
operators, government and donors can assist by either financing capacity
training activities like the annual financial literacy week which started some
years ago. Additionally Banks and other institutions can also diversify their
corporate social responsibilities (CSR) portfolio and commit some fund to
develop and train their SME clients.
I
hope after reading this feature it has been clear that there is no truth about the
assertion that money from a financial institution
can collapse a business due to “juju or
spiritual” reason but what can collapse the business may be the lack of
adequate knowledge on how to negotiate for loans as well as how to manage your loan and a
business.
Thank you for the feedback .We can improve financial impact with financial literacy
ReplyDelete